Contributed by dhartmei on from the its-not-the-years-honey-its-the-mileage dept.
I have activated pre-orders for the 3.8 release.We think that lots of new groovy stuff has made it into this release. Check out http://www.openbsd.org/38.html for more information.
Artistically, the release is based on our RAID management efforts. Thus, we have named the release "The Hackers of the Lost RAID", with all the artwork.... and an uncoming song too.
The artwork and the song will be release piece by piece, since not all of it is done yet.
(Comments are closed)
By Chris Snell (66.25.86.139) on http://bikeworld.com
Comments
By X (81.56.211.110) on
By Marcus Glocker (193.134.254.145) marcus@nazgul.ch on http://www.nazgul.ch
Comments
By Rod (218.214.194.113) on
I am partly to blame because I found a much kinder case that will hold 4 CDs and it is only the same dimension as a jewelcase. The reason it survives better is that it is made of polythene (more flexible) and it holds 2 CDs per side on hubs that interlock with each other.
The coversheets (and all-important stickers) go in behind a thin transparent sheet that is welded to the leading edge of both the front and back case parts.
Why blame me? Well Austin doesn't have the sample yet! Dopey here lost it in the NOC (Nasty Old Closet) and only had an attack of the guilties when placing his advance order for a couple of 3.8s and another T.
I promise to get it to the Post Office by Monday with a load of 4 CDs and the thinnest packaging so that we can see how well it lasts with a full load.
Here's to a future where I never hear about another broken retainer lug and Austin relaxes a bit at release time.
Rod/
By Seb (213.118.74.206) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (70.228.5.169) on
By Dan (195.212.29.92) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (195.224.109.30) on
Comments
By dan (80.178.166.102) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (195.224.109.30) on
<http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=112671575615807&w=2>
By Pablo Méndez Hernández (80.58.3.235) on
By Noryungi (82.123.104.50) on
Sorry for the stupid question, but has anybody reported port breakage after the addition of the new malloc(3) functionality? According to Theo himself, the new malloc(3) could result in SIGSEGV in software that is not made by the OpenBSD project...
Comments
By Clay Dowling (12.37.120.99) clay@lazarusid.com on http://www.ceamus.com
I'm actually really looking forward to this release because it will make a good additional check for my apps. While I'd like to think that I'm writing code that doesn't segfault I'll feel a lot better when I can run it reliably on a system that won't tolerate dicey memory handling.
Comments
By veins (82.234.175.151) veins@skreel.org on http://www.skreel.org/~veins/
By Anonymous Coward (195.224.109.30) on
I haven't reported them though ... my bad
Comments
By Peter Valchev (209.115.248.34) on
By Amir Mesry (65.13.17.20) starkiller@web-illusions.net on
Comments
By deannapayne (24.73.189.10) deannafelicicpayne2@yahoo.com on
By Anonymous Coward (216.220.225.229) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (130.237.95.193) on
By tcremer (67.189.30.51) on http://www.writtenignition.org