Contributed by grey on from the dept.
Yes | 26.1% (161 votes) | ||
No | 35.4% (219 votes) | ||
Just /etc/systrace/usr_sbin_lpd | 0.2% (1 votes) | ||
Just /etc/systrace/usr_sbin_named | 1.5% (9 votes) | ||
I use USE_SYSTRACE for building ports | 4.7% (29 votes) | ||
I wish there were more shipped by default | 19.1% (118 votes) | ||
I use everything on hairy eyeball | 1.8% (11 votes) | ||
I write my own if I can't find one | 3.9% (24 votes) | ||
I write my own period, can't trust anyone and systrace -i is great | 7.4% (46 votes) | ||
Total votes: 618
(Comments are closed)
By Anonymous Coward (217.120.147.78) on
By Anonymous Coward (192.84.184.75) on
Comments
By Janne Johansson (130.237.95.115) on
By Anonymous Coward (216.220.225.229) on
By Luiz Gustavo (200.165.130.203) on http://hades.uint8t.org
It's not that easy tracking all new ports and -current, so I'm trying. (;
By SH (82.182.103.172) on
This is very nice as it will means much less work to start using systrace for a port. But I can understand that port maintainers might sceptical of the amount of work that may be put on them as they have to test the application running under systrace as well.
Comments
By Luiz Gustavo (200.225.76.130) on http://hades.uint8t.org
Still doing ftpd one, works but incomplete.
By Anonymous Coward (141.39.13.5) on