Contributed by grey on from the subtle changes and improved documenation dept.
Ryan provided us with an additional description as follows:
With this change, if you do:
       set optimization aggressive
and then later comment it out:
       #set optimization aggressive
The timeouts go back to the defaults; the same applies for:
set limit
set timeout
set hostid
set loginterface
set fingerprints
set debug
The same behaviour will come to 'set skip' as well soon.
(Comments are closed)
By Anonymous Coward (67.102.173.11) on
By Anonymous Coward (24.28.122.248) on
Comments
By Peter Hessler (64.173.147.27) on
By Anonymous Coward (151.188.16.16) on
I am learning OpenBSD as well; it looks like it's got a lot to offer. I'm definitely looking forward to playing with this CARP redundancy; that looks like a really cool, highly useful hack.
By Anonymous Coward (62.175.42.214) on
Comments
By Otto Moerbeek (213.84.84.111) otto@drijf.net on http://www.drijf.net
A commented out set should return the value to its default. This only comes into effect on the next pf.conf reload.
If you specify:
So to repeat, this new feature only applies if you load a new ruleset which does not have values specified for some settings. These will be reset to default values.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (63.119.50.193) on
By Anonymous Coward (217.186.52.50) on
set optimization aggressive
# and later:
set optimization default
By Ed White (151.38.57.205) on http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-pf&m=108620553405608&w=2
Comments
By Michael Knudsen (217.157.199.114) on
Exactly what do you want credit for? You asked if a certain behaviour was intended without explaining why you think it is bad, and as far as I can se, you didn't provide any patches either.
Good work, Ed.
By Anonymous Coward (12.33.122.68) on
Comments
By Ed White (151.37.17.110) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (12.33.122.68) on
By Kevin (198.53.199.4) on
By Anonymous Coward (68.148.237.181) on
If you didn't fix it, why do you want credit for the fix?
If you're comparing finding a "strange/weird problem" to finding a remote exploit as the same class and you're demanding the same acknowledgement, then hopefully these proverbs will help.
"Climbing a mountain, one should not give up when difficulties accumulate. Accumulating merit, one should not complain about fate." Proverb
"Climbing a mountain, one should not give up when difficulties accumulate. Accumulating merit, one should not [climb a mountain.]" Proverb
"A samurai may be distressed by his own lack of ability, but never by the failure of others to recognize his merits." Proverb
By Luiz Gustavo (200.165.131.133) on http://hades.uint8t.org
Perhaps you should stop seeking fame and glory paying attention only to be really happy of just having a clue to finding bugs, having good ideas or simply writing good code.
If you are to browse around cvs history you will end up seeing loads of credits being given, maybe it is just a developer a bit lazy early in the morning. (;
By Anonymous Coward (151.188.16.16) on
Comments
By Ed White (151.37.23.56) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (12.33.122.68) on
somebody who has not produced shit!
By Ben Lindstrom (208.27.203.127) mouring@eviladmin.org on
Frankly, I really dislike people that go "I want XX credit for suggestion ZZ.. I want ZZ copyright placed at the top of the file because of my PDQ patch..." Code comes and goes. I'm sure that code I've written or helped QC back in the mid-1990 has been long since replaced. And not getting a copyright or CVS plug doesn't bother me.
Why? I know what I have done. There isn't a need to broadcast such stuff to the whole world. It wouldn't gain me any more respect, love or money than I'm making now. And it doesn't boost my self-esteem which was very well established when I was younger.
- Ben
By Ed White (151.42.63.232) on http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net/pf.c?only_with_tag=OPENBSD_3_6
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (66.114.79.48) on
in case same issue shows up again or the same code has to be modified
and testing needs to be done again for the same problem.
what is the value of a bug report w/ no fix supplied to be credited for?
_you_ are supposed to credit whoever fixed your problem for you with
generous offer of beer.
By Anonymous Coward (213.119.4.84) on
By djm@ (203.217.30.86) on
Comments
By Ed White (151.37.23.79) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (66.114.79.48) on
you prefer to be done by somebody else.... way to go!
By jtorin (194.103.189.24) on
Comments
By Ed White (151.37.27.147) on
Comments
By Brad (216.138.200.42) brad at comstyle dot com on