Contributed by jcs on from the which-way-to-go dept.
CVSROOT: /cvs Module name: src Changes by: itojun@cvs.openbsd.org 2004/04/24 20:48:04 Modified files:It seems there will be much more awesome features in the next-next 3.6 release ;-)"
sys/conf : files sys/kern : vfs_subr.c sys/net : pf_table.c radix.c radix.h route.c route.h rtsock.c sys/netinet : in_proto.c sys/netinet6 : in6_proto.c Added files: sys/net : radix_mpath.c radix_mpath.h Log message: radix tree with multipath support. from kame. deraadt ok user visible changes: - you can add multiple routes with same key (route add A B then route add A C) - you have to specify gateway address if there are multiple entries on the table (route delete A B, instead of route delete A) kernel change: - radix_node_head has an extra entry - rnh_deladdr takes extra argument TODO: - actually take advantage of multipath (rtalloc -> rtalloc_mpath)
(Comments are closed)
By j knight (68.146.204.200) enabled@myrealbox.com on
woot! :)
Comments
By Dan (80.178.120.94) on
By Anthony (192.208.10.217) on
We now know our place. We are the Cisco killer.
Comments
By anonymous (203.108.15.199) on
By m (195.137.120.127) on
Comments
By Otto (82.197.192.49) otto@drijf.net on
Following -current should get you a pretty close picture of what will be in the next release. Once in a while you'll see posts here and on misc@ to draw attention to new stuff.
Anything more will just distract developers from the real thing: hacking. With all the distractions developers are already subjected to, I don't think we need more.
By Tony S (62.84.195.38) on
Comments
By Brad (216.138.200.42) brad at comstyle dot com on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (66.114.79.48) on
Comments
By Jared Yanovich (192.88.114.251) on
By Jon (67.153.107.130) on http://slbd.sf.net
http://slbd.sf.net
thus far it's working well, although some of the more advanced functionality isn't there right now.
jon
By Anonymous Coward (66.56.80.196) on
By Jim (198.62.124.245) on
Comments
By tedu (128.12.75.69) on
By Eduardo Alvarenga (200.227.95.57) on
I think it is a MUST.
Linux does and FreeBSD does. Is it planned?
Comments
By Brad (216.138.200.42) brad at comstyle dot com on
By Hroi (2001:1448:80:7d::3) on
Comments
By strgout (65.70.175.249) on
Comments
By Brad (216.138.200.42) brad at comstyle dot com on
By Justin Lindberg (130.94.162.64) justin@srvo.net on
Way to go!