Contributed by jose on from the missing-information dept.
In particular it is quite sad to see how the author obviously is unaware of the article a few pages before (no PDF) on Adamantix which bemoans how quite a few programs do not run with PaX enabled under Linux, that PaX is not integrated by default in any distribution, etc. and compares it instead to OpenBSD where userland has been compiled with ProPolice and works with W^X and/or systrace.
I've written a letter to the editor as I happen to be a subscriber and I can demand that they leave out pointless trolling from the magazine but it would be good if someone from the OpenBSD camp offered to send them an article about "secure by default"."
(Comments are closed)