Contributed by jose on from the killin-the-baddies dept.
smtp-vilter is the interface between sendmail and the actual virus scanner an can be configured for different backends. It has been developed, tested and used on OpenBSD (and runs on Linux as well.)
Today we released smtp-vilter under the BSD license. The software can be downloaded at http://www.etc.msys.ch/software/smtp-vilter . A port to ease installation is on the way..."
That's pretty awesome. Not only do you get a secure, high performance mail server that's resistant to the typical Windows desktop viruses and worms, you get to do it on a budget. Thanks, Marc!
(Comments are closed)
By ViPER () viper@dmrt.net on http://www.dmrt.net
Guess not, correct me if i'm wrong.
For all the Postfix users
http://clamav.elektrapro.com
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/
http://www.renaissoft.com/projects/maia/
Database updated (containing in total 9876 signatures).
Database updated from clamav.elektrapro.com.
amavisd-new & Maia Mailguard (web frontend) did the trick for us to convince the client he didn't need ms stuff after all ;) spam / virri filter catches 99% having -+ 200 users
Comments
By Wouter () on
Comments
By ViPER () viper@dmrt.net on http://www.dmrt.net
In short every user can be hold responsible for his own config besides the 'main' config offcourse & keep an eye on there own quarantine.
By Anonymous Coward () on
Comments
By Fábio Olivé Leite () foleite at yahoo.com.br on mailto:foleite at yahoo.com.br
By Anonymous Coward () on
Comments
By Per-Olov Sjöholm () on
I am trying to sort this out right now. Maybe somebody can come up with good answers in this area.
I have seen the following:
* smtp-vilter (stand alone)
* clamav-milter (built in)
* IVS-Milter (stand alone)
Is there a reason for not using the built in clamav-milter in clamav (except that smtp-vilter can use the Symantec engine) ?
How about the future for these three mentioned above ?
But smtp-vilter looks nice and compiles ok on my OpenBSD 3.4 box without any trouble...
/Per-Olov