Contributed by jose on from the kickin-ass-and-showing-who's-who dept.
The articles are a bit quick in their pace, but overall the exposure of PF to large masses of UNIX users is a Good Thing™. This should help convince people to install OpenBSD and use it to provide low cost, high quality network filters and appliances.
(Comments are closed)
By Mark () on
As for Zonker's articles, it would be more accurate to say that many new users are often surprised that after installing OpenBSD, all they have is a bare system, almost a skeleton. Then comes the question : how do they put meat on it ? I know the answer is RTFM but for people like young cousin Vinnie (a fake name), an OS installed with no GUI is quite a frightening sight.
Last thought, is it really a good thing to kind of relegate OpenBSD to the niche of low cost, high quality network filters and appliances ? After all, many people use it as their main desktop OS.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on
Comments
By SFN () on
On a bare system?
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on
By Anonymous Coward () on
Unfortunately, you then have a bare bones GUI..
I love OBSD, and use it for hours each day managing our large network, but do I wish it were a little easier to get a web browser and other stuff going. Maybe we need a "set up workstation" script that did a:
cd /usr/ports
cd ; make ; make install
cd ; make ; make install
and on.
and at the end, we have a workstation with
a decent calculator(for example), browser, and MS Office compatible office automation suite.
I dreaming, I know....
Comments
By SFN () on
People are starting to buy into Linux in larger numbers. If they realized that OpenBSD was more solid, more secure, etc. AND was just as easy to set up as Linux, if not easier, AND had the same software available, tides could turn.
Sure, one could play the whole "1337" card and say that it doesn't need to be easy but that's just foolish.
By Anonymous Coward () on
what the hell are you talking about? Apache is default. dumbass. Maybe we need a "get a clue" script.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on
it says "browser" - i read "server".
By Fábio Olivé Leite () foleite@yahoo.com.br on mailto:foleite@yahoo.com.br
You'll end up with a _very_ complete, GUI and kitchen sink desktop OS.
Just don't do that on the company's firewall. :-D
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on
Comments
By Fábio Olivé Leite () foleite@yahoo.com.br on mailto:foleite@yahoo.com.br
Fluxbox is really nice, but since I went to a software company with mostly windows heads I noticed that KDE makes me not look _so_ odd.
People still stare at the maximized Konsole or xterm and ask me why I like my desktop so dark. Then I usually fire up vim on some random source file and say "look at them colors!". :-)
By Anonymous Coward () on
gives you more beer etc
By Anonymous Coward () on
You can't write one that's good for everyone, as everyone likes different apps. And installing everything is unnecessary bloat. If you want that, go and use linux ;-)
By James A. Peltier () james@site-fx.net on http://www.site-fx.net
Than it just a simple make install and go away.
By Jedi/Sector One () j@pureftpd.org on http://www.pureftpd.org/
My girlfriend doesn't know _anything_ about computer science and she doesn't want to.
But she sometimes want to browse the internet, read/write email, fetch and view pics from the digital camera, write basic documents, print stuff and play freecell.
It's why I decided to set up a hard disk for her, with OpenBSD and every basic stuff from a workstation preinstalled and configured.
I will not always keep this OS and the installed apps up to date. I don't want her to be vulnerable to viruses, worms and other internet annoyances. It's why I chose OpenBSD.
Until you get a fully functionnal workstation for a real novice a lot of steps have to be performed. Not just pkg_add kde*. For instance KDE is absolutely not ready to use the printer after that. It doesn't have any icon to click on in order to browse the inserted CDROM. [k]mplayer and Xmms are not optimally configured. KDM has to be installed in place of XDM so that she can easily turn the computer off. Java has to be configured in Konqueror. Nice-looking fonts have to be installed and configured. Kmail has to be configured. Etc.
It's why I'm writing this little paper that explains step by step how to install a "girlfriend-ready" system from scratch. Maybe it can help a lot of people who don't consider OpenBSD on the desktop.
Comments
By Jedi/Sector One () j@pureftpd.org on http://www.pureftpd.org/
FreeBSD has a small wrapper to use the Linux plugin with FreeBSD browsers (at least Mozilla and Konqueror), it would be really nice if something similar did exist on OpenBSD.
Yes, Flash is binary-only, proprietary, etc. But nowadays it's a bit mandatory to properly browse the we and opensource re-implementations are way behind the proprietary one :(
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on
Comments
By tedu () on
By grey () the email the email the the the email. DELETED! on http://www.homestarrunner.com
I've seen with my own two eyes jsyn@ viewing homestarrunner.net (it's Dot Com) on OpenBSD. I believe just using the linux emulation cruft to get a linux plugin to work. I tend not to use X at all, so I've not tried myself - but you might want to reinvestigate that issue.
Burninate!
By tedu () on
By Anonymous Coward () on
Opera + using Netscape plugin.
WINE / CrossOver + .exe (x86 only, deprecated).
Mozilla, probably.
I have never had these problems on any of my boxes, except that with Netscape 4.x things like java were unstable. I'm not running OpenBSD on my desktop but my guess is that this should work. After all, Netscape got ported to a *lot* of archs and OSes.
By Anonymous Coward () on
By Petr R. () pruzicka@openbsd.cz on mailto:pruzicka@openbsd.cz
By Anonymous Coward () on
By systrace () bofh@nni.com on cowofb0rg.org
Yes alot of people do, but thats just not what openbsd is about IMO. If i wanted something more desktop oriented i'd use a more desktop oriented OS.
Take linux for example, it tries to be a server OS, and a desktop OS..I'm not saying it does a horrible job, but the kernel is far from simple, and it added more bloat for desktop features.
I think OpenBSD should keep doing what its doing, and concentrate on the features that it has always concentrated on. How does that saying go ? "Free, Functional, Secure".
I would prefer if OpenBSD stayed the course of ultra secure, and also becoming more finely tuned for performance in a clean fashion. (No Magic Numbers!!:)
just my 2c
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on
By Anonymous Coward () on