Contributed by jose on from the i386-holidays dept.
From: Theo de Raadt (deraadtcvs.openbsd.org) Date: Mon May 05 2003 - 12:50:55 CDT when we designed the i386 W^X stuff, dale and i made a little mistake. there's a better way which I call 512m high program mapping. anyways, the result of this is that people need to re-upgrade if they are running i386 snap, to a new i386 snap that goes out soon. the binary file format has changed again, and not all old binaries will run. so you can do this with new /bsd.rd, boot it, and upgrade. that's going out the door today.Hurray for the bleeding edge. Time for yet another download and upgrade.
(Comments are closed)
By Anonymous Coward () on
Comments
By mirabile () mirabile@bsdcow.net on http://MirBSD.BSDadvocacy.org/
entire userland, and then get a kernel with
the final vmparams.h
By Alejandro Belluscio () b a l d u s i@NOy a h o oSPAM.c o m on mailto:b a l d u s i@NOy a h o oSPAM.c o m
> What is the main difference between the old and the new binary file
> format?
3.3
a.out
Last week:
ELF
executable mapped at around 0
data segments for each module maps 1GB higher
~0 main program code
.. gap
512M ld.so code
libc code
1G main program data
... gap for MAXDSIZ of 512
1.5G ld.so data
libc data
new:
~0 ld.so code
libc code
...
512-64M main program code
...
1G ld.so code
libc code
...
1.5G-64M main program data
... MAXDSIZ can now be much larger
this is better.
Comments
By Eduardo Alvarenga () eduardo at thrx dot dyndns dot org on mailto:eduardo at thrx dot dyndns dot org
Just KDE will take about +2 days to complete... AGAIN!
Comments
By Peter Valchev () pvalchev@openbsd.org on mailto:pvalchev@openbsd.org
By Blake () funkboy at two one one two dot net on mailto:funkboy at two one one two dot net
By Anonymous Coward () on
Comments
By Jedi/Sector One () j@pureftpd.org on http://www.pureftpd.org/
By Anonymous Coward () on
Comments
By Jedi/Sector One () j@pureftpd.org on http://www.pureftpd.org/
By Darren () darren@dazdaz.NOSPAMM.org on mailto:darren@dazdaz.NOSPAMM.org
Admit the mistake and move on, good leadership there.
Regards
Comments
By Kay () on
By Anonymous Coward () on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on