OpenBSD Journal

What ever happen to KVMspy?

Contributed by jose on from the performance-monitoring dept.

anonymous asks:
"What happen to KVMspy? KVMspy seems to me to be lost. Does anyone have any info on it?"
KVMspy is lost. It uses outdated memory information and was just a quick hack to test kernel performance. It should be easy for anyone with fair programming skills to replicate, just start with kvm(3). Performance monitoring goes well beyond just ps(1) and top(1), so does anyone have anything to add?

(Comments are closed)


Comments
  1. By Anonymous Coward () on

    ugh, the last thing we need are _more_ programs trolling through /dev/kmem. Write something sysctl()-based, please!

    Comments
    1. By Anonymous Coward () on

      You mean something using Practical Extraction and Reporting Language, the one included in OpenBSD base system without asking you first?

      Comments
      1. By Anonymous Coward () on

        No, moron. Rather than reading data directly from /dev/kmem, give the kernel support for exporting it in a structured format via sysctl.2

        If you had any clue whatsoever, you would see that this is the direction that things have been moving for some time (c.f. netstat).

        Comments
        1. By Moron Troll () on

          What is "IT"? A kernel? Perl?

  2. By - () - on -

Credits

Copyright © - Daniel Hartmeier. All rights reserved. Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors, submission implies license to publish on this web site. Contents of the archive prior to as well as images and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original deadly.org with Jose's and Jim's kind permission. This journal runs as CGI with httpd(8) on OpenBSD, the source code is BSD licensed. undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]