Contributed by jose on from the memory-allocation dept.
Many thanks go out to Miod and Peter for their coordination with us on these advisories. I would also like to take a moment and clearly state that we are trying to coordinate the release of patch information with the OpenBSD team more closely to ensure that all information and patches are available at the appropriate time. They have been very helpful and accomodating in this, and their help is greatly appreciated.
(Comments are closed)
By Anonymous Coward () on
By Dom () on
Releasing software with bugs is fine, but releasing software with known bugs and then sitting on publishing fixes is not.
It would have gone to OpenBSDs credit if patches were announced before the CDs were posted.
This is not a good way to do things, and OpenBSD has taken a lot of critism in the past for doing the same thing ("oh yea, we found and fixed that ages ago, but didn't tell anyone til now")
By Anonymous Coward () on
By Anonymous Coward () on
Look at http://online.securityfocus.com/bid/5991
- remote Yes
- OpenBSD 2.8
- OpenBSD 2.9
- OpenBSD 3.0
- OpenBSD 3.1
OpenBSD ships with apache, but if you want a secure web-server you have to compile apace for the source and update when a new version is out.
By Pedro () on
Too bad some people on in these comment boards feel the need to whine about an OS which they've probably never even used and at the same time dont understand the goals of OpenBSD well enough to even make a normal critical analysis of the project.