Contributed by Dengue on from the another-trip-to-the-book-store dept.
Unfortunately, it is not available online, you'll have to visit your favorite corporate mega-bookstore near you. -ed
(Comments are closed)
OpenBSD Journal
Contributed by Dengue on from the another-trip-to-the-book-store dept.
Unfortunately, it is not available online, you'll have to visit your favorite corporate mega-bookstore near you. -ed
(Comments are closed)
Copyright © - Daniel Hartmeier. All rights reserved. Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors, submission implies license to publish on this web site. Contents of the archive prior to as well as images and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original deadly.org with Jose's and Jim's kind permission. This journal runs as CGI with httpd(8) on OpenBSD, the source code is BSD licensed. undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]
By el duderino () on
Comments
By Alex C. de Haas () alex@PureBSD.com on http://PureBSD.com
I don't think that's a legal way to distribute
that article (-: You could try to contact the
author and ask for permission to publish it
somewhere online, though.
-- Alex
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on
Comments
By BluNereid () on
By webmaster () dengue@deadly.org on file:/dev/null
By ark^baby () on
By Law () law@l.aw on mailto:law@l.aw
It wouldn't be illegal because the content of the scanned data is not modified in any way, and your not making any profits with it, also your advertising it with their logo and name, so nothing would happen.
Comments
By morals () morals@morals.com on mailto:morals@morals.com
Comments
By pff. () on
is selling a book for 120$ right?
Comments
By proof () proof AT xcheese.org on http://www.xcheese.org/~proof
I think that 'morals' is probably right. By scanning and publishing something on the web, it's like we're borrowing someone else's time and effort without asking first. What if you wrote a paper that took you 40 hours to make, and someone borrowed it without your permision and published it on the web? Not exactlly the same situation, but I think it's analgulous to what we'd be doing.
This relativist morals stuff makes me sick.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on
I'm not an English speaker myself but, do you mean analogous (not sure about the right spelling though)?
And btw, I agree with you. Sick with all that gnu/free/cheap stuff. That kind of people should never be paid for their work, and see how they feel about it!!!
By Anonymous Coward () on
By Wes Peters () wes@dobox.com on mailto:wes@dobox.com
By Marc Espie () espie@openbsd.org on mailto:espie@openbsd.org
Just because you don't make profit out of it doesn't mean you can repost COPYRIGHTED material.
The only thing you could possibly do is post some excerpts of that article. There ARE some fairly drastic limitations in size, even then, but knowing what nice things they say about OpenBSD (or not so nice things) would be good
(this would fall under the `fair use for review'
clause).
By Alex C. de Haas () alex@purebsd.com on http://purebsd.com
Most magazines and books are protected by
copyright law. You often read that without
written permission from the author you can't
redistribute/publish/whatever it in any way.
Whether you agree on this or not, it is
illegal by law if you didn't get the author's
permission.
Here in The Netherlands, every written word
is implicitly protected by law. So if you skip
the legal stuff in your paper, book, article,
etc, people still need your permission. I think
this applies to American law too, as far as I
know.
If you just rip a scan from an SysAdmin article,
it means less sales for SysAdmin and perhaps
less money for the author.
If people provide information for sale, they
are in their right. If you don't approve, don't
buy it and retrieve it from a different source.
You can't tell someone how to live. (though, I
do that right now:)
-- Alex
By Jan J () on
And they have written about OpenBSD before. So, subscribe and send them an email "I see you write about OpenBSD and have just bought a one year subscribtion because of that." They write more about OpenBSD, we get more sites that want OpenBSD, that push in money and that need support, our support, and the money will get back to you.
In the best of worlds atleast.
By Fisherman () tkyle at-schmat inlink dot com on mailto:tkyle at-schmat inlink dot com
I beg to differ. Last time I checked, OpenBSD had fingerd and identd (through inetd), sshd, and sendmail (-q30m only) enabled. I don't know of any other system that comes with as few services enabled immediately after installation.
So I wouldn't be too upset about not having it available online. ;)
Comments
By Alex C. de Haas () alex@purebsd.com on http://purebsd.com
I installed the i386 port of NetBSD 1.5. Wow,
that was heavy. All lines in /etc/inetd.conf
were prepended with a neat little `#', no SSH
daemon was running and I think not even sendmail
was chewing cpu cycles by default. But I'm not
completely sure of the latter one.
My point: there is an Unix that comes with less
services enabled by default than OpenBSD.
I honestly hope the OpenBSD project won't get
all jealous and ships OpenBSD 2.9 with no CPU
support enabled by default.. or something like
that (-:
-- Alex
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on
Almost as it is not about closing absolutely everything ... it's about closing everything that may put security at risk.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on
I like that.
Comments
By wysoft () wysoft@wysoft.tzo.com on mailto:wysoft@wysoft.tzo.com
Comments
By Anonymous Coward () on
*grin*
By Anonymous Coward () on