Contributed by Dengue on from the good-for-a-flame dept.
Personally, I would have to say no. I am perfectly content with fdisk/disklabel. You do have to read the install docs, but I think it's pretty straightforward from there. I don't want to see gui or menu based configuration utilities as part of the base either, since they don't always display correctly on different TERM types.
What do you think?
(Comments are closed)
By Jeff Duffy () jduffy@semcor.com on mailto:jduffy@semcor.com
I use OpenBSD when I have heavy security requirements; firewall components, bastion / victim hosts, etc. While I wish that every machine in my shop could run it, we just have some hardware and software requirements OpenBSD doesn't yet support - then we go to Free.
My point is, having GUIs is all fine and well for a desktop user, but if you don't know how to do a simple install from a CLI, you sure as heck don't know how to lock down your box efficiently and you probably shouldn't be messing with a secure host configuration anyway.
By pixel fairy () my first name in a company called slimey. on mailto:my first name in a company called slimey.
the documentation seem sufficient, but i could be wrong. if anything needs to be changed for newbies, that would be it. though openbsd has good docs. it has the best man pages (all of them have examples)
so i dont see the problem.
By Ian () on
computers and have an idea what they are doing.
First, I'm going to say that I have *really* come to value the openbsd install. I just plain love it. It's so simple, it's beautiful... many of th e graphical installs (and I've recently battled with freebsd and redhat), are just plain painful in comparison.
That being said however, I do think the openbsd fdisk could use some work. CLI is fine, but I can see room for improvements in its interface and utility.
By Jan Johansson () jdoe@someprovider.net on http://wenf.org/
It is not hard to learn. It takes a few retries but after a 5-10 installations it is the fastest I have seen. And if you screw up, reboot and go at it again.. I usually restart 3 times on an install.. (Cause I am clumsy with adding IPs and such).
Yesterday I reinstalled a box in under an hour. Including FTP fetch. In Windows install I find myself jumping with "TAB" and can never find the right time to hit space.
Which leads me to say "All install GUIs are crap."
By bengt kleberg () on
So, I can live with fdisk, once, but I really think disklabel should provide defaults for partitions. And adjust the other partitions, if I change one. None of thisautomagically, but if I ask.
By Noryungi () noryungi@yahoo.com on mailto:noryungi@yahoo.com
By Stephen Gregory () on
By sekure () sekure@mediaone.net on http://sekure.ne.mediaone.net
By LiNT () lint@hungover.com on mailto:lint@hungover.com
However, the other day for the hell of it I thought I'd try to do a dual boot on my laptop. End result I hosed my partitions and lost some data that I should have backed up. I did read through all the doc's that I could find but I either couldn't find the right information or understand what I found. I'm sure I could figure it out after a few more tries but I was pretty pissed at that point. I think a good walkthrough on different configurations for fdisk or a detailed section in the FAQ would solve everything without the need for a new partition program.
It's become pretty apparent to me that OpenBSD is designed by the developers for the developers. While there are some who are willing to help out the new users and make the OS more friendly, I think the majority aren't interested in the newbie crowd. That's fine, on one hand I can see how the developers don't want to bastardize thier OS to make it more user friendly, on the other hand it sucks for me because the documentation is thin and there are just enough differences between obsd and linux that the linux documentation doesn't help much.
In the end OpenBSD has my vote. It's the greatest OS I've used. The simplicity makes it so much nicer to work with and I won't give that up. I'll just continue to ask moronic questions and bug everyone on the mailing list.
LiNT
By Fisherman () tom@foundation.umsl.edu on mailto:tom@foundation.umsl.edu
I was also pleased when I first installed 2.5 and found that the installer hadn't snuck a bunch of binaries all over the system - I got a basic, functional system that I could setup the way I wanted. I didn't have to go through and uninstall things that I didn't want or didn't fully understand the purpose of.