Contributed by jason on from the endless-parkour-and-baconcheesetube dept.
Dan Colish takes a moment from surfing videos to send us this tip:
Late one night, I got really sick of missing out on youtube and youtube-dl defeats the point of streaming media. Using greasemonkey and HQTube you can now stream those flv's into mplayerplug-in. It's pretty cool and now you can pretend you have flash!
Editor's Note: The HQTube page has some configuration tweaks listed for mplayer and mplayerplug-in that might be useful for users.
(Comments are closed)
By Eric Radman (72.28.48.198) ericshane@eradman.com on http://eradman.com
Comments
By Dan Colish (dcolish) on http://www.unencrypted.org
>
intelligence
Comments
By Mike Erdely (merdely) on http://erdelynet.com/
> >
>
> intelligence
I would like to thank Dan for pointing out this helpful tip for non-flash users to be able to view highly shared video content on the net. While the idiot purists might want to live in their igloos and surf their BBSs, some of us actually appreciate the ability to watch their family's uploaded videos.
Thanks, Dan.
Comments
By Igor Sobrado (2001:b18:401c:200:212:f0ff:fe24:cfe3) on
Agreed. Even if we do not see a lot of youtube videos, it is good being able to access to this resource without using flash. As you, I think that it is a very valuable tip. There are a few nice BSD related conferences available on youtube.
By Jona Joachim (2a01:e35:2ea9:abd0:20e:a6ff:fe42:de) jaj@hcl-club.lu on
> > >
> >
> > intelligence
>
> I would like to thank Dan for pointing out this helpful tip for non-flash users to be able to view highly shared video content on the net. While the idiot purists might want to live in their igloos and surf their BBSs, some of us actually appreciate the ability to watch their family's uploaded videos.
>
> Thanks, Dan.
With all due respect, you are actually the guy using the BBS.
Youtube is a form of BBS. Your family pictures have *absolutely nothing* to do on Youtube servers, they should be on your server. That's what the Internet is all about.
The Internet is not a place where servers propose content and clients consult the content, it is a place where every machine is client and server at the same time.
Comments
By Vincent Mollimard (82.228.186.22) vmlhp@laposte.net on
> server at the same time.
This guy is definitly right. Don't see the internet as a centralised system where servers are far away from home and you act only as a client.
Serving your family pictures by yourself is serving your liberty.
Serving your privacy trough youtub is serving for a kind of numerical slavery.
V.M.
By tedu (udet) on
> With all due respect, you are actually the guy using the BBS.
> Youtube is a form of BBS. Your family pictures have *absolutely nothing* to do on Youtube servers, they should be on your server. That's what the Internet is all about.
> The Internet is not a place where servers propose content and clients consult the content, it is a place where every machine is client and server at the same time.
Exactly. Why would I want to host videos on a site with unlimited bandwidth and storage for free when I can pay more for less?
I once thought about putting a video on Facebook. But then I realized that my friends would be notified about it. It was much better to rent a server, put the video there, and hope people stumbled across it. Because that's what the internet is all about.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (2a01:e35:2ea9:abd0:20e:a6ff:fe42:de) on
> > With all due respect, you are actually the guy using the BBS.
> > Youtube is a form of BBS. Your family pictures have *absolutely nothing* to do on Youtube servers, they should be on your server. That's what the Internet is all about.
> > The Internet is not a place where servers propose content and clients consult the content, it is a place where every machine is client and server at the same time.
>
> Exactly. Why would I want to host videos on a site with unlimited bandwidth and storage for free when I can pay more for less?
>
> I once thought about putting a video on Facebook. But then I realized that my friends would be notified about it. It was much better to rent a server, put the video there, and hope people stumbled across it. Because that's what the internet is all about.
Don't make cynic remarks about things you don't understand.
The question about how much freedom you are ready to give up in exchange for a certain amount of comfort is a question that everybody has to answer for himself. I do not judge you on whether you run your own server or not, I could not care less.
All that I'm saying is that it is fundamently wrong to say that people who refuse to use Youtube are retarded Internet users. In fact the opposite is true.
By the way, little that you know, you most certainly pay for Youtube, whether you use it or not. In fact your ISP has to pay to be able to route traffic towards Youtube, that's how things work on the AS/BGP level. Your ISP will most certainly reflect those costs on their customers. This means that a small amount of the monthly fee you pay to your ISP will go directly to Youtube whether you want it or not.
Comments
By tedu (udet) on
> By the way, little that you know, you most certainly pay for Youtube, whether you use it or not. In fact your ISP has to pay to be able to route traffic towards Youtube, that's how things work on the AS/BGP level. Your ISP will most certainly reflect those costs on their customers. This means that a small amount of the monthly fee you pay to your ISP will go directly to Youtube whether you want it or not.
Is part of my monthly fee going to pay for your server? I think I'd like a refund.
Comments
By Jona Joachim (2a01:e35:2ea9:abd0:20e:a6ff:fe42:de) jaj@hcl-club.lu on
No
By Dan Farrell (danstermeister) on dannosbeerblog@blogspot.com
> Youtube, that's how things work on the AS/BGP level.
I read this as-
"Yo, that's how things work on the AS/BGP level".
word.
By sthen (2a01:348:108:100:230:18ff:fea0:6af6) on
youtube/google and most CDNs peer, settlement-free, *very* heavily. if your ISP is in an area of the world with reasonable connectivity and pays transit charges to reach youtube (rather than just using their own WAN links to reach an IX), they aren't peering all that widely themselves.
By Anonymous Coward (70.7.196.147) on
I like to watch videos on youtube, if you spend 100% of your time on the CLI then feel free.
but the more I can do on my OBSD desktop the less I need to switch to OS X.
Thanks Dan, keep up the good work.
> > > Yes, this is what we need. What kind of sickness is cured by soaking up YouTube content?
> > >
> >
> > intelligence
>
> I would like to thank Dan for pointing out this helpful tip for non-flash users to be able to view highly shared video content on the net. While the idiot purists might want to live in their igloos and surf their BBSs, some of us actually appreciate the ability to watch their family's uploaded videos.
>
> Thanks, Dan.
By tedu (udet) on
>
Closed-mindedness.
By Jona Joachim (2a01:e35:2ea9:abd0:20e:a6ff:fe42:de) on http://www.hcl-club.lu/~jaj/
youtube-dl --get-url "$1" | xargs mplayer
It works very well for streaming. It even works for Youtube playlists.
But of course having the video immediately inside the browser is nicer.
Comments
By Dan Colish (dcolish) on http://www.unencrypted.org
> youtube-dl --get-url "$1" | xargs mplayer
> It works very well for streaming. It even works for Youtube playlists.
> But of course having the video immediately inside the browser is nicer.
This is a nice solution too. Thanks for sharing!
By Anonymous Coward (38.103.144.42) on
Be ashamed.
Very ashamed.
Comments
By c2 (208.191.177.19) on
>
> Be ashamed.
> Very ashamed.
I'll agree with you on the Flash part, but I've seen both bad and good on YouTube.
What I like more about this, though, is that it shows that with a little ingenuity, you can duplicate the functionality of Flash -- without the Flash. I doubt the open-source world will topple the Flash hegemony (or I guess Flash and Silverlight now, as I see that alter-evil popping up more and more), but the more that it is demonstrated that you don't *need* Flash to do things like YouTube, and you *can* do it with open-source tools, the better.
By Predrag Punosevac (71.52.246.16) on
> OpenBSD user would even consider using it.
So you would prefer that I can not check the health insurance information
of my kids or that I have to do that from an insecure platform and jeopardize their private information. Oh, please get a life. Human stupidity is infinite but we can not deal with it by pretending that it doesn't exist. Flash is, unfortunately, part of the Internet and it would be the best if there was an official Adobe flash plug-in for OpenBSD.
In the case you wonder, I have written at least 20 letters of complaints to web-masers and management of my health insurance company complaining about safety of their servers including the use of Flash as well as Javascript.
And no, I do not watch YouTube nor my children are allowed to watch without my supervision. They, by the way, use yt script to fetch the video
and watch it with MPlayer.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (208.124.37.81) on
By Dan Colish (dcolish) on http://www.unencrypted.org
>
> Be ashamed.
> Very ashamed.
There is no accounting for taste
By Luke Maurits (2001:470:18:278::2) on
Yeah, I guess that Itojun guy was a real loser...
By Dean (63.225.103.147) on
How about this? At work I get paid to manage a large Cisco wireless system, with over 800 Cisco APs. The management software from Cisco is web based, and I can access it from OpenBSD+Firefox just fine. But part of the application uses Flash to graph usage and other things. If I want to get my work done, I have to use Flash. And now (for a while) Gnash is unable to process the current version of Flash Cisco uses.
Do I wish I didn't have to use Windows while at work? Sure. Am I going to quit my job so I don't have to use Windows? In this economy, no.
I'll root for the gnash developers and porters. And I'll skip Youtube for the most part, agreed that it has lots of stuff that I'll never be interested in.
By Anonymous Coward (200.185.134.85) on
>
> Be ashamed.
> Very ashamed.
If OpenBSD had native working flash you would not say that.
OpenBSD is for servers, period.
Comments
By Brad (2001:470:b01e:3:216:41ff:fe17:6933) brad at comstyle dot com on
Where do retarded assholes like you come from?
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (80.239.26.211) on
>
> Where do retarded assholes like you come from?
The internet.
By Jordi Beltran Creix (jbcreix) jbcreix.mail@gmail.com on
Wonder why the port hasn't been updated, though, as it works pretty well here.
Comments
By Dan Colish (dcolish) on http://www.unencrypted.org
> Wonder why the port hasn't been updated, though, as it works pretty well here.
Why not submit those diffs to ports?
Comments
By Jordi Beltran Creix (jbcreix) on
http://www.security-express.com/archives/openbsd/2009-03/0496.html
The patches no longer work as they appear on that thread because upstream included some of the patches but it's a matter of removing the conflicting patches and it works.
By Brad (2001:470:b01e:3:216:41ff:fe17:6933) brad at comstyle dot com on
> Wonder why the port hasn't been updated, though, as it works pretty well here.
Its a dead project with a single author that doesn't give a shit. There is another option which people seem to keep missing if you open your eyes...
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (72.65.239.254) on
> > Wonder why the port hasn't been updated, though, as it works pretty well here.
>
> Its a dead project with a single author that doesn't give a shit. There is another option which people seem to keep missing if you open your eyes...
Personally, I prefer swfdec to gnash. Their underlying philosophies are nicely summarized in this interview with their principal developers:
swfdec simply seeks "to create an open flash player that is acceptably similar to Adobe's flash player". Gnash, in contrast, wants to be one component in a vast "multi-media architecture for a networked world that happens to be Flash programmable". YUCK! Flash breaks the web, in the sense that it's difficult to index or navigate flash in an automated way. I, for one, do not want the vast, flash-based multimedia architecture that Gnash envisions. I only want to be able to deal with the occasional annoyance of a flash-based website, and swfdec is the right tool for that job.Comments
By Brad (2001:470:b01e:3:216:41ff:fe17:6933) brad at comstyle dot com on
>
> http://www.gnashdev.org/?q=node/30
>
> swfdec simply seeks "to create an open flash player that is acceptably similar to Adobe's flash player". Gnash, in contrast, wants to be one component in a vast "multi-media architecture for a networked world that happens to be Flash programmable". YUCK! Flash breaks the web, in the sense that it's difficult to index or navigate flash in an automated way. I, for one, do not want the vast, flash-based multimedia architecture that Gnash envisions. I only want to be able to deal with the occasional annoyance of a flash-based website, and swfdec is the right tool for that job.
I guess it is too much to ask for you to understand what he was really trying to say. But then again undeadly seems to be full of complete and utter morons nowdays. Go ahead and stick with your unmaintained broken software.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (125.193.2.26) on
Oh yes we are all morons, but some of us would rather have some support now than never or when GNU Hursh gets its act together.
But this applies to so many things in OpenBSD that I just stopped caring about what the non-morons think and just use whatever I see fit, thanks for the code.
I just feel for those that cannot and get verbally abused or ignored when they suggest something.
Comments
By Brad (2001:470:b01e:3:216:41ff:fe17:6933) brad at comstyle dot com on
You are just proving I am right!
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (125.193.2.26) on
No I was admitting you were "right", you are just proving you are an asshole.
If your point was that we shouldn't want to be able to view content encoded in flash format at all, when it's perfectly possible in many ways as shown here, there are other trolls above you that made the same stupid point more eloquently and without coming out as irremediable retards.
Probably because they bothered to make their point instead of just abusing people for the sake of it.
Comments
By Brad (2001:470:b01e:3:216:41ff:fe17:6933) brad at comstyle dot com on
and your point is? I have no problem being an asshole to morons.
> If your point was that we shouldn't want to be able to view content encoded in flash format at all, when it's perfectly possible in many ways as shown here, there are other trolls above you that made the same stupid point more eloquently and without coming out as irremediable retards.
Not even close. That is the complete opposite direction of where I was going.
By Anonymous Coward (71.193.191.48) on
> > Wonder why the port hasn't been updated, though, as it works pretty well here.
>
> Its a dead project
since when?
> with a single author that doesn't give a shit.
about what? if you are referring to audio backends, I think he
was right to remove the OSS backend, and I fully understand his
reason for not adding the sndio backend.
> There is another option which people seem to keep missing if you open your eyes...
gnash? if you just want to view swf content, which is what this
article is about, swfdec is a much simpler solution. it's also possible
to turn off autoplay in swfdec, which you can't do in gnash. very
important feature imo, since both can do bad things if they encounter
something they can't handle.
Comments
By Brad (2001:470:b01e:3:216:41ff:fe17:6933) brad at comstyle dot com on
>
> since when?
There have been zero commits to the project in 5 months and the author said in a blog post that he most likely won't be working on it anymore and he was more or less the only person doing so.
> > with a single author that doesn't give a shit.
>
> about what? if you are referring to audio backends, I think he
> was right to remove the OSS backend, and I fully understand his
> reason for not adding the sndio backend.
Ah, so the idea is that only operating systems based on Linux should have a Flash implementation.. or you're forced to use it with no sound. That's a GREAT implementation.
> > There is another option which people seem to keep missing if you open your eyes...
>
> gnash? if you just want to view swf content, which is what this
> article is about, swfdec is a much simpler solution. it's also
> possible to turn off autoplay in swfdec, which you can't do in
> gnash. very important feature imo, since both can do bad things if
> they encounter something they can't handle.
This article has nothing to do with viewing SWF content. SWF != Flash video.
Your assumption is that it is simpler but that is just not so and that autplay saves you from bad things which again is not so.
It is also possible to turn off autoplay with Gnash.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (125.193.2.26) on
Very sad, yet this single manned and abandoned project is still the only flash player that works on OpenBSD and will probably keep that title for a long time seeing as Gnash is unable to play any flash content at all.
> It is also possible to turn off autoplay with Gnash.
The problem with Gnash is that is not possible to turn play on.
Comments
By Brad (2001:470:b01e:3:216:41ff:fe17:6933) brad at comstyle dot com on
Nothing but god damn lies.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (125.193.2.26) on
Maybe if you got out of Stallman's basement and tried to actually use swfdec and Gnash instead of doing their PR from a dumb terminal, you would see why I support the swfdec port rather than being happy with that GNU garbage.
Hell, there are ports for proprietary crap that hasn't been updated since 1991. Once Gnash is remotely close to swfdec functionality and stability you can dance over swfdec's tomb all you want.
However, whatever the GNUtards are focusing their development efforts on, it isn't related to 99% of the flash applets in the wild, so supporting them doesn't help our access to contents an apex.
If you want you can prove I am lying by posting a video on Youtube where your OpenBSD accesses any real flash based site at all using Gnash. I would love to see it(no really).
By Anonymous Coward (72.65.239.254) on
You are correct about the commit rate:
but the swfdec developer mailing lists are still alive and well> It is also possible to turn off autoplay with Gnash.
Although Gnash's StartStopped option can be toggled to turn autoplay off, it still downloads the entire Flash file, wasting bandwidth. The Firefox Flashblock plugin is a better option, in my opinion, if you're going to use OpenBSD's port of Gnash.
Comments
By Brad (2001:470:b01e:3:216:41ff:fe17:6933) brad at comstyle dot com on
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/swfdec/swfdec/
>
> but the swfdec developer mailing lists are still alive and well
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/swfdec/
What's your point? There are projects that have had no releases in many years and are officially dead yet have very active mailing lists. The projects are still dead.
By Anonymous Coward (71.193.191.48) on
> >
> > since when?
>
> There have been zero commits to the project in 5 months and the author said in a blog post that he most likely won't be working on it anymore and he was more or less the only person doing so.
got a URL to that blog post?
> > > with a single author that doesn't give a shit.
> >
> > about what? if you are referring to audio backends, I think he
> > was right to remove the OSS backend, and I fully understand his
> > reason for not adding the sndio backend.
>
> Ah, so the idea is that only operating systems based on Linux should have a Flash implementation.. or you're forced to use it with no sound. That's a GREAT implementation.
the author uses Linux. that's all he can verify as working correctly.
maybe you see that as a bias for Linux, I see that as not adding code
you can't verify.
> > > There is another option which people seem to keep missing if you open your eyes...
> >
> > gnash? if you just want to view swf content, which is what this
> > article is about, swfdec is a much simpler solution. it's also
> > possible to turn off autoplay in swfdec, which you can't do in
> > gnash. very important feature imo, since both can do bad things if
> > they encounter something they can't handle.
>
> This article has nothing to do with viewing SWF content. SWF != Flash video.
if youtube and these other video sites made flv files available
via a hyperlink, then we wouldn't need any kind of flash
engine/interpreter/script. but they don't give us links to
flv files, they give us swf files, which reference flv files.
so yes, it *is* about *swf* content, moron.
> Your assumption is that it is simpler but that is just not so and that autplay saves you from bad things which again is not so.
right, because you know exactly what my usage is.
> It is also possible to turn off autoplay with Gnash.
the closest thing I see when right clicking is "start paused". quite
different than not doing anything.
Comments
By Jacob Meuser (71.193.191.48) jakemsr@sdf.lonestar.org on
> > >
> > > since when?
> >
> > There have been zero commits to the project in 5 months and the author said in a blog post that he most likely won't be working on it anymore and he was more or less the only person doing so.
>
> got a URL to that blog post?
>
> > > > with a single author that doesn't give a shit.
> > >
> > > about what? if you are referring to audio backends, I think he
> > > was right to remove the OSS backend, and I fully understand his
> > > reason for not adding the sndio backend.
> >
> > Ah, so the idea is that only operating systems based on Linux should have a Flash implementation.. or you're forced to use it with no sound. That's a GREAT implementation.
>
> the author uses Linux. that's all he can verify as working correctly.
> maybe you see that as a bias for Linux, I see that as not adding code
> you can't verify.
>
> > > > There is another option which people seem to keep missing if you open your eyes...
> > >
> > > gnash? if you just want to view swf content, which is what this
> > > article is about, swfdec is a much simpler solution. it's also
> > > possible to turn off autoplay in swfdec, which you can't do in
> > > gnash. very important feature imo, since both can do bad things if
> > > they encounter something they can't handle.
> >
> > This article has nothing to do with viewing SWF content. SWF != Flash video.
>
> if youtube and these other video sites made flv files available
> via a hyperlink, then we wouldn't need any kind of flash
> engine/interpreter/script. but they don't give us links to
> flv files, they give us swf files, which reference flv files.
> so yes, it *is* about *swf* content, moron.
>
> > Your assumption is that it is simpler but that is just not so and that autplay saves you from bad things which again is not so.
>
> right, because you know exactly what my usage is.
and btw, I'm not making assumptions.
> > It is also possible to turn off autoplay with Gnash.
>
> the closest thing I see when right clicking is "start paused". quite
> different than not doing anything.
>
By Anonymous Coward (72.65.239.254) on
>
> got a URL to that blog post?
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (24.21.85.143) on
> >
> > got a URL to that blog post?
>
>
>
> http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2008/12/18/on-loneliness
>
>
The problem isn't that no one cared about swfdec, it's that he posted to IRC. No one has answered me either.
By Anonymous Coward (123.243.32.166) on
For everyone's amusement......
Date/Time: 2009-05-17 17:39:56.866 +1000
OS Version: Mac OS X 10.5.7 (9J61)
Report Version: 6
Anonymous UUID: BA53198D-01B3-4163-BE5C-ED34FB7D68EC
Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV)
Exception Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x0000000076656c5f
Crashed Thread: 0
Thread 0 Crashed:
0 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x14560bd0 0x144cf000 + 596944
1 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x1455515b 0x144cf000 + 549211
2 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x14634c85 0x144cf000 + 1465477
3 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x14634f13 0x144cf000 + 1466131
4 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x145ceaf4 0x144cf000 + 1047284
5 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x144f35be 0x144cf000 + 148926
6 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x144f3b14 0x144cf000 + 150292
7 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x1467937b 0x144cf000 + 1745787
8 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x145e6b5a 0x144cf000 + 1145690
9 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x1467b933 0x144cf000 + 1755443
10 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x145d3f01 0x144cf000 + 1068801
11 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x145db62c 0x144cf000 + 1099308
12 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x144f357e 0x144cf000 + 148862
13 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x144f7c97 0x144cf000 + 167063
14 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x1467937b 0x144cf000 + 1745787
15 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x145e6b5a 0x144cf000 + 1145690
16 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x1467b4be 0x144cf000 + 1754302
17 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x144e76fd 0x144cf000 + 100093
18 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x1467937b 0x144cf000 + 1745787
19 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x145e6b5a 0x144cf000 + 1145690
20 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x1467b4be 0x144cf000 + 1754302
21 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x144e76fd 0x144cf000 + 100093
22 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x1467937b 0x144cf000 + 1745787
23 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x145e6b5a 0x144cf000 + 1145690
24 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x1467b4be 0x144cf000 + 1754302
25 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x144e76fd 0x144cf000 + 100093
26 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x1467937b 0x144cf000 + 1745787
27 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x145e6b5a 0x144cf000 + 1145690
28 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x146583fb 0x144cf000 + 1610747
29 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x1466a3f4 0x144cf000 + 1684468
30 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x1466a288 0x144cf000 + 1684104
31 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x146c83c0 0x144cf000 + 2069440
32 ...romedia.Flash Player.plugin 0x147bb4b4 Flash_EnforceLocalSecurity + 11540
33 com.apple.WebKit 0x9706c904 -[WebBaseNetscapePluginStream _destroyStream] + 324
34 com.apple.WebKit 0x9706c6d3 -[WebBaseNetscapePluginStream finishedLoading] + 67
35 com.apple.WebKit 0x9706c650 WebNetscapePlugInStreamLoaderClient::didFinishLoading(WebCore::NetscapePlugInStreamLoader*) + 48
36 com.apple.WebCore 0x966bcec5 WebCore::NetscapePlugInStreamLoader::didFinishLoading() + 53
37 com.apple.Foundation 0x94bd24a7 -[NSURLConnection(NSURLConnectionReallyInternal) sendDidFinishLoading] + 87
38 com.apple.Foundation 0x94bd2413 _NSURLConnectionDidFinishLoading + 147
39 com.apple.CFNetwork 0x94a06b96 URLConnectionClient::_clientDidFinishLoading(URLConnectionClient::ClientConnectionEventQueue*) + 212
40 com.apple.CFNetwork 0x94a078e0 URLConnectionClient::ClientConnectionEventQueue::processAllEventsAndConsumePayload(XConnectionEventInfo<XClientEvent, XClientEventParams>*, long) + 310
41 com.apple.CFNetwork 0x94a0636c URLConnectionClient::processEvents() + 104
42 com.apple.CFNetwork 0x949b3dbf MultiplexerSource::perform() + 189
43 com.apple.CoreFoundation 0x90d4a595 CFRunLoopRunSpecific + 3141
44 com.apple.CoreFoundation 0x90d4ac78 CFRunLoopRunInMode + 88
45 com.apple.HIToolbox 0x958b328c RunCurrentEventLoopInMode + 283
46 com.apple.HIToolbox 0x958b30a5 ReceiveNextEventCommon + 374
47 com.apple.HIToolbox 0x958b2f19 BlockUntilNextEventMatchingListInMode + 106
48 com.apple.AppKit 0x9509fd0d _DPSNextEvent + 657
49 com.apple.AppKit 0x9509f5c0 -[NSApplication nextEventMatchingMask:untilDate:inMode:dequeue:] + 128
50 com.apple.Safari 0x0000802e 0x1000 + 28718
51 com.apple.AppKit 0x950985fb -[NSApplication run] + 795
52 com.apple.AppKit 0x95065834 NSApplicationMain + 574
53 com.apple.Safari 0x000b9af6 0x1000 + 756470
By Martin Toft (130.225.243.84) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (131.207.242.5) on
I used ffmpeg line from yt script instead and it's great.
> http://keepvid.com/ is yet another possibility.
By Anonymous Coward (83.145.204.27) on
Like others above, I am not a big fan of Flash. I can live without it. Yet, last month I noticed on OpenBSD Journal that conference videos from DCBSDCon 2009 were available -- on YouTube!
I find this truly sad and beyond ironic, given that most people in our community do not have a decent support for Flash.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (131.207.242.5) on
Don't know why it isn't pointed somewhere on dcbsdcon directly :-(
> Great that there are some options.
>
> Like others above, I am not a big fan of Flash. I can live without it. Yet, last month I noticed on OpenBSD Journal that conference videos from DCBSDCon 2009 were available -- on YouTube!
>
> I find this truly sad and beyond ironic, given that most people in our community do not have a decent support for Flash.
By Anonymous Coward (131.207.242.5) on
HQTube needs updating, it is no longer compatible.
Funny part is that I download it yesterday :-)
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (131.207.242.5) on
> People you have it running?I have 4.5 -current with FF and I get only :
>
> HQTube needs updating, it is no longer compatible.
>
> Funny part is that I download it yesterday :-)
By Greg (207.81.226.211) on
By olden (olden) *whatever* at olden.ch on
Still, hopefully this whole Flash/FLV cruft and related cool hacks will fade eventually, as HTML5 (now draft) introduces the <video> tag and browsers start to support this. At long last, open standards embedded video!..
I'm posting this with Firefox 3.5 and stuff like this (check out the source, nice and clean) works. There's hope. :-)
By Ed Ahlsen-Girard (68.1.69.60) girarde@alum.rpi.edu on