Contributed by mitja on from the covered-in-yellow-stickers dept.
Following his recent commit of OpenOffice.org 3 port, Robert Nagy (robert@) writes in to remind us all that the upcoming 4.5 release will have both OpenOffice.org 2 and OpenOffice.org 3 packages available. After the 4.5 release, the editors/openoffice is going to be removed from the builds and there will be no more packages of it.
If you want to make sure that we have a stable and functional port of the latest OpenOffice.org version, get involved! Now it's the time to start testing the editors/openoffice3 packages and help iron out the remaining bugs.
(Comments are closed)
By Venture37 (venture37) venture37<A>hotmail.com on http://www.geeklan.co.uk
Comments
By Renaud Allard (renaud) on
Seems more than openoffice3 and openoffice will be present in 4.5, and 4.6 onwards will only have openoffice3
By zyon (88.70.139.150) rafael@sizeofvoid.org on http://www.sizeofvoid.org
zyon
Comments
By Mitja Muzenic (mitja) on .
Fixed, thannnks! :)
By Peter J. Philipp (2001:a60:f074::2) on http://solarscale.de
Comments
By Brad (2001:470:b01e:3:216:41ff:fe17:6933) brad at comstyle dot com on
It is wishful thinking if you think it would take anything less than that ;)
By Markus Peloquin (incripshin) on http://cs.wisc.edu/~markus
Comments
By daniel Ouellet (66.63.10.88) daniel@presscom.net on
I never downloaded the source and even less compile from port, but if anyone knows I would be curious to know. If not, I sure will not loose any sleep over it either.
Thanks
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (150.101.245.181) on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_lines_of_code
Makes me wonder just what that many lines of code are for. Or why you need 10gb to build it.
By phessler (phessler) on http://theapt.org
building OOo3 on openbsd/amd64 took more than the 8G I have for /usr/obj :(
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (85.158.44.149) on
>
>
> building OOo3 on openbsd/amd64 took more than the 8G I have for /usr/obj :(
WRKOBJDIR_editors/openoffice3=/somewhere/bigger