Contributed by grey on from the and they are undeadly regulars too, sorry about the delay dept.
I recently posted to advocacy@ about how we are using OpenBSD here at kozoru. Here is the original message:
"We are working on a natural language processing system for parsing
questions and getting back answers (think Ask Jeeves, except works). We
are using OpenBSD on all our nodes in our cluster. Currently we have 82
running and processing Wikipedia. The nodes are simple x86 boxen,
running 2.4G Celerons w/ 512M RAM, booting OpenBSD 3.7 off a 64M USB
stick. For data storage we are using sqlite inside a 256M memory file
system. Here is a picture of our first rack we had setup:
http://wopr.drippingdead.com/~cdowns/cluster.jpg
Check out our website at http://www.kozoru.com for more information if
you are interested on what we are currently doing."
Word is getting around the BSD websites, and since most of us at kozoru not only use OpenBSD as our workstation but we frequent undeadly.org quite often, I figured I would pass the story on here.
(Comments are closed)
By Venture37 (217.22.88.123) venture37 # hotmail com on www.geeklan.co.uk
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (216.175.250.42) on
What, the curtains?
By Fábio Olivé Leite (15.235.153.99) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (143.166.226.16) on
Comments
By Fábio Olivé Leite (15.235.153.99) on
By Chris (24.76.117.234) on
Why didn't he say machines? Or, God forbid, computers! What exactly is the appeal of superfluous (read: useless) technical jargon?
Comments
By Fábio Olivé Leite (15.235.153.99) on
By Anonymous Coward (80.185.69.65) on
By Kyle (128.174.209.48) on
By Anonymous Coward (66.44.2.39) on
By Anonymous Coward (66.131.206.50) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (212.144.112.76) on
By Matt Van Mater (63.164.202.130) on
By foorfi (209.44.12.117) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (67.64.89.177) on
Because Debian sucks goat ass?
Because Debian sucks goat ass?
Because Debian sucks goat ass?
Because Debian sucks goat ass?
Because Debian sucks goat ass?
Because Debian sucks goat ass?
Comments
By foorfi (209.44.12.117) on
By Anonymous Coward (66.44.2.39) on
Comments
By Michael Knudsen (217.157.199.114) on
What I like best about the debian package tools is all the stuff it knows you wanted to do but didn't say it should. For instance like the other day when I wrote "apt-get install apache", it just knew that I intended to type "apt-get remove ssh'' afterwards and acted accordingly.
Good thing I like riding the bus to work.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (64.173.147.27) on
By Anonymous Coward (69.36.252.2) on
By Anonymous Coward (216.254.12.156) on
Not exactly a rousing endorsement of OBSD with that thing in there, unless, of course, that box is running PF off flash memory on that Intel MB ;-)
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (208.252.48.163) on
Comments
By Luiz Gustavo (69.93.158.202) on http://hades.uint8t.org
By Anonymous Coward (203.58.120.11) on
By Lars Hansson (203.65.245.7) lars@unet.net.ph on
By Anonymous Coward (213.84.93.41) viper@dmrt.net on http://www.dmrt.net
Comments
By Richard Toohey (203.167.190.49) richardtoohey@hotmail.com on
Comments
By henning (80.86.183.227) henning@ on
it's a (transparent and filtering) proxy.
there's countless proxies available for OpenBSD, many in the ports tree, and if there's one missing for some protocol you need, they are pretty easy to write too.
Comments
By Richard Toohey (203.167.190.49) richardtoohey@hotmail.com on
I'm looking at moving off an ISA server that redirects incoming traffic on one IP to a number of internal servers based on http host headers and my Googling revealed "layer 7 filtering" - (as well as transparent proxies and more) - lots more reading required ...
By Anonymous Coward (69.2.33.129) on
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (142.109.90.79) on
By Alexandre Belloni (82.233.187.15) on http://piout.net
By Anonymous Coward (64.81.117.127) on
one reference to OpenBSD
36) The puffer fish on the openBsd t-shirt is not a girl
some advocate hey
Comments
By Paul Tomlin (82.152.46.31) on
Comments
By SH (82.182.103.172) on
Well, both of them have tatooes ;-)
Comments
By Paul Tomlin (81.168.14.14) on
Comments
By Paul Tomlin (81.168.14.14) on
By Anonymous Coward (69.158.155.70) on
Comments
By ViPER (213.84.93.41) viper@dmrt.net on http://www.dmrt.net
My guess...
SuperServer 5013C-M or SuperServer 5013G-M
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (69.158.155.70) on
Has anyone else here used USB sticks in this capacity? I am wondering how reliable or flaky they are. By that I mean compact flash cards have a limited amount of writes so is it wrong of me to assume that is the case with USB sticks as well?
Comments
By seigemann (80.203.53.119) on
You will be able to use this very much like a normal hard drive, and there's no worrying about read/write limitations.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (213.118.74.148) on
Most (all?) USB sticks use regular Flash-memory chips. That's right, the same stuff they put into CF cards, ...
So there shouldn't really be a difference in reliability, durability, ...
Comments
By seigemann (80.203.53.119) on
By D. E. Evans (166.70.206.22) sinuhe@gnu.org on http://www.deevans.net
Now that I see it's Flash, I have lost interest.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (195.224.109.30) on
By tony (70.243.229.241) tony@kozoru.com on