OpenBSD Journal

Bugtraq stats.

Contributed by Dengue on from the put-up-or-shut-up dept.

Noryungi writes : "This article on ZDNet is all about the BUGTRAQ stats -- NT being the "worst" operating system for security systems (as if that's a surprise). What's more interesting for OpenBSD is the short list at the end of the article in which we can see that OpenBSD has a grand total of less than 10 security issues reported in the last 4 years. Sweet... "

(Comments are closed)


Comments
  1. By Hugo Villeneuve () hugo_villeneuve@yahoo.com on mailto:hugo_villeneuve@yahoo.com


    If you follow bugtraq religiously like me, you have to ask yourself, what's counting as a security bug in the OS.

    Cause FreeBSD sends big security announcement for each security bug for programs in its port tree. Do they count also?

    I don't have a problem with Microsoft count. I'm happy I don't use their product much.

  2. By Boris () on

    OpenBSD 4 bugs in 1999.
    Way too much. Very scary.

  3. By Joe@Blowfish.ch () on

    Let's not forget that other operating systems are used much more than OpenBSD. I think that if more people used OpenBSD more security bugs would be found.

Credits

Copyright © - Daniel Hartmeier. All rights reserved. Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors, submission implies license to publish on this web site. Contents of the archive prior to as well as images and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original deadly.org with Jose's and Jim's kind permission. This journal runs as CGI with httpd(8) on OpenBSD, the source code is BSD licensed. undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]