Re: New mandoc -mdoc -T markdown converter (mod -5/113)
by Ingo Schwarze (schwarze) on Sun Mar 5 14:24:10 2017 (GMT)
> when can we expect
Don't you know that question is illegal in OpenBSD land?
Stuff is ready when it is ready.
No cheap talk. No roadmap committees. Shut up and hack.
> ingoml for writing documentation when mdoc(7) doesn't suit?
No plans. I don't see any need for that.
For *documentation*, it is an asset, not a limitation, to conform to mdoc(7) conventions.
It provides a good structure and helps users because they are already familiar with the style.
If you write documentation and mdoc(7) seems like a poor fit, you are doing something wrong.
That said, for non-documentation typesetting, mdoc(7) cannot become the right tool, or it would lose its strength for documenation. But i'm not planning to write another typesetting language. That is not an area where there is need for something new. Two very good typesetting languages already exist: (La)TeX and roff. Besides, i lack the knowledge about typesetting required to do even better. Typesetting is a craft and an art.
[ Show thread ] [ Reply to this comment ] [ Mod Up ] [ Mod Down ]
Add Story |
Copyright © 2004-2008
All rights reserved.
Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors,
submission implies license to publish on this web site.
Contents of the archive prior to April 2nd 2004 as well as images
and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original
Jim's kind permission.
Some icons from slashdot.org
used with permission from Kathleen.
This journal runs as CGI with
on OpenBSD, the
source code is
Search engine is ht://Dig.
undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]