avoid P-256? (mod 3/115)
by Chas (220.127.116.11) on Wed Jan 11 18:36:13 2017 (GMT)
If I never use P-256, and always set either curve = secp384r1 or curve = secp521r1, then I can safely ignore this problem?
DJB only approves of the 521 curve in any case (and I always use it unless I'm dealing with Google Chrome):
To be fair I should mention that there's one standard NIST curve using a nice prime, namely 2^521 - 1; but the sheer size of this prime makes it much slower than NIST P-256.
[ Show thread ] [ Reply to this comment ] [ Mod Up ] [ Mod Down ]
Add Story |
Copyright © 2004-2008
All rights reserved.
Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors,
submission implies license to publish on this web site.
Contents of the archive prior to April 2nd 2004 as well as images
and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original
Jim's kind permission.
Some icons from slashdot.org
used with permission from Kathleen.
This journal runs as CGI with
on OpenBSD, the
source code is
Search engine is ht://Dig.
undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]