Contributed by rueda on from the pruning dept.
Support for the zaurus platform has been removed from -current.
Philip Guenther (guenther@) committed the change:
CVSROOT: /cvs Module name: src Changes by: guenther@cvs.openbsd.org 2016/09/03 07:37:46 […] Log message: Retire zaurus, as it hasn't made the EABI jump and will be permanently broken shortly when we use the hardware thread register in userland
(This follows the recent removal of support for the sparc[32] platform.)
(Comments are closed)
By frk (176.10.104.243) on
(however, I am still unable to find the original source of this quote; the first BOOK mentioning it, without reference, is probably E. Raymond - The Art of UNIX Programming from 2003)
Comments
By phessler (phessler) on http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/donations.html
By Anonymous Coward (118.20.98.73) on
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://marc.info/%3Fl=openbsd-cvs%26m=147294297501630%26w=2
Comments
By almeida (almeida) on
> https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://marc.info/%3Fl=openbsd-cvs%26m=147294297501630%26w=2
>
Any idea why LLVM ended up as src/gnu/llvm?
Comments
By phessler (phessler) on http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/donations.html
read src/gnu/README
By Marc Espie (espie) on
> Any idea why LLVM ended up as src/gnu/llvm?
Mostly because we didn't want a new toplevel srcdir for big things.
Note that perl already lives there even though it's obviously under the Autistic licence by OpenLSD standards.
Comments
By sebastian Rother (78.42.111.136) on
> > Any idea why LLVM ended up as src/gnu/llvm?
>
> Mostly because we didn't want a new toplevel srcdir for big things.
>
> Note that perl already lives there even though it's obviously under the Autistic licence by OpenLSD standards.
Whcih i critisized since it's confusing..... I asked about WHAT license was choosen some years ago. Is it realy so hard to add a directory? :-/
For me it was confusing and I was not alone....
Btw: Are you incorporating Changes from Bitrig? They once made similiar Changes and porting could be likely easier.
Comments
By Anonymous Coward (192.35.17.16) on
>
> For me it was confusing and I was not alone....
>
> Btw: Are you incorporating Changes from Bitrig? They once made similiar Changes and porting could be likely easier.
You are confused easily... Let me add to that gnu is not what you think, in this context it now stands for "Gigantic and Nasty but
Unavoidable"