OpenBSD Journal

Call for Testing: tame userland diff

Contributed by tbert on from the hall-of-tame dept.

After recently publishing the slides from his talk on the subject, Theo de Raadt (deraadt@) has just mailed the masses, letting us know where we are with tame(2):

For those who are curious, this is the tame diff which is currently
in snapshots.  Yes, we are asking for testing and feedback.

The full diff follows in the original mail, but it's probably simpler to just use a snapshot. For those of you who've been looking forward to seeing how it handles, now's the time to find out.

(Comments are closed)

  1. By Anonymous Coward ( on

    Will tame never work with systrace policies? Why don't the two work together?

    1. By Anonymous Coward ( on

  2. By jay ( on

    Since we now have tame "exec", can we have "!" back in dc?

Latest Articles


Copyright © - Daniel Hartmeier. All rights reserved. Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors, submission implies license to publish on this web site. Contents of the archive prior to as well as images and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original with Jose's and Jim's kind permission. This journal runs as CGI with httpd(8) on OpenBSD, the source code is BSD licensed. undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]