OpenBSD Journal
Home : : Add Story : : Archives : : About : : Create Account : : Login :
Heads Up: BIND Disabled in Base
Contributed by tbert on Sat Aug 23 06:39:48 2014 (GMT)
from the night of the living tedu dept.

After many years of being the default DNS server, BIND has been disabled in OpenBSD base:

CVSROOT:	/cvs
Module name:	src
Changes by:	deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org	2014/08/22 13:19:25

Modified files:
	etc            : Makefile changelist group master.passwd rc 
	                 rc.conf 
	etc/mail       : aliases 
	etc/mtree      : 4.4BSD.dist 
Removed files:
	etc/bind       : db.localhost db.loopback db.loopback6.arpa 
	                 named-dual.conf named-simple.conf root.hint 
	etc/rc.d       : named 
	etc/systrace   : usr_sbin_named 

Log message:
disable use of bind in base; in the base use nsd/unbound instead.
a proper & complete bind port will show up.
discussed with many for years

In another commit, the build instructions have been pared back to provide the minimum command line utilities users are used to finding:

CVSROOT:	/cvs
Module name:	src
Changes by:	brad@cvs.openbsd.org	2014/08/22 13:28:25

Modified files:
	usr.sbin/bind  : Makefile.bsd-wrapper Makefile.in configure 
	                 configure.in 
	usr.sbin/bind/bin: Makefile.in 

Log message:
Strip the BIND code down to just building and installing dig, host and nslookup.

Users who wish to continue using BIND will have to wait for the port to show up; those wanting to use base to serve their needs will now (finally) need to transition to unbound.

[topicopenbsd]

<< BSDNow Episode 051: Engineering Nginx | Reply | Flattened | Expanded | Heads Up: Nginx Removed From Base >>

Threshold: Help

Related Links
more by tbert


  Re: Heads Up: BIND Disabled in Base (mod 4/36)
by sthen (2001:4b10:1002:cc05:24f7:e369:310c:6480) on Sat Aug 23 09:32:42 2014 (GMT)
  "Users who wish to continue using BIND will have to wait for the port to show up" - the port has been around since 5.2.
  [ Show thread ] [ Reply to this comment ] [ Mod Up ] [ Mod Down ]

  Re: Heads Up: BIND Disabled in Base (mod -1/27)
by Anonymous Coward (91.65.157.11) on Fri Aug 29 11:23:46 2014 (GMT)
  Why just disabling it and not removing it? :-)

Also: Who uses LKM?! Any Kernel Modules out there anybody is aware of?
  [ Show thread ] [ Reply to this comment ] [ Mod Up ] [ Mod Down ]

  Re: Heads Up: BIND Disabled in Base (mod 2/26)
by Anonymous Coward (193.200.119.132) on Sat Aug 30 20:45:37 2014 (GMT)
  When Sendmail will be removed from base?
And what's next? YP?
  [ Show thread ] [ Reply to this comment ] [ Mod Up ] [ Mod Down ]

[ Home | Add Story | Archives | Polls | About ]

Copyright © 2004-2008 Daniel Hartmeier. All rights reserved. Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors, submission implies license to publish on this web site. Contents of the archive prior to April 2nd 2004 as well as images and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original deadly.org with Jose's and Jim's kind permission. Some icons from slashdot.org used with permission from Kathleen. This journal runs as CGI with httpd(8) on OpenBSD, the source code is BSD licensed. Search engine is ht://Dig. undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]