Re: I'm wating for it to be moved into ports/packages (mod 12/68)
by Anonymous Coward (126.96.36.199) on Sun Jul 16 07:16:04 2006 (GMT)
The problem isn't that autoconf isn't that it's GPL; it's that it sucks. I can't imagine what sort of perverse mind would start out with the idea of building a cross-platform, multi-architecture way to build software, and manage to make something that is as hostile to popular software and hardware combinations, as well as being as generally unportable, as GNU autoconf is (if you've ever tried to compile most sourceforge projects directly from a source tarball while not on a Linux/x86 system, you know what I mean).
Most software, if written properly, shouldn't require more than a Makefile. If that is not enough, chances are the software is written in a completely unportable manner anyway
[ Show thread ] [ Reply to this comment ] [ Mod Up ] [ Mod Down ]
Add Story |
Copyright © 2004-2008
All rights reserved.
Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors,
submission implies license to publish on this web site.
Contents of the archive prior to April 2nd 2004 as well as images
and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original
Jim's kind permission.
Some icons from slashdot.org
used with permission from Kathleen.
This journal runs as CGI with
on OpenBSD, the
source code is
Search engine is ht://Dig.
undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]