Re: X.Org X11R7.x in OpenBSD (mod -4/72)
by Anonymous Coward (188.8.131.52) on Fri Jul 14 22:59:08 2006 (GMT)
> Because xlogo and xeyes are a component of X11 since 1986-87
I don't see why that means we should keep them. Tradition for tradition's sake?
> These small clients are not really complex ones and do not require a lot of HDD space.
This is a good point. In fact:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11.0K Mar 10 13:36 /usr/X11R6/bin/xeyes
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 34.8K Mar 10 13:36 /usr/X11R6/bin/xlogo
I guess there's no real benefit to removing 45.8K for the sake of saving 45.8K. The trade-off: we use an extra 46K of disk space, and, if someone down the road misses these programs they don't have to do a pkg_add.
> In fact, xlogo is useful to check that the render extension is enabled too!
That's kind of silly, when there's:
$ xdpyinfo | grep RENDER
[ Show thread ] [ Reply to this comment ] [ Mod Up ] [ Mod Down ]
Add Story |
Copyright © 2004-2008
All rights reserved.
Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors,
submission implies license to publish on this web site.
Contents of the archive prior to April 2nd 2004 as well as images
and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original
Jim's kind permission.
Some icons from slashdot.org
used with permission from Kathleen.
This journal runs as CGI with
on OpenBSD, the
source code is
Search engine is ht://Dig.
undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]