Re: iptables (mod 4/90)
by Anonymous Coward on Wed Mar 26 06:06:00 2003 (GMT)
Iptables is hard to configure compared to IPF or PF. Long options, you have to run their program in order to set each rule (iptables this, iptables that). Plus for bandwidth control you need other separate tools which are even more obscure.
IPF and PF are very easy to figgure out. PF also has very useful additional features. If you want to add some temporary rules you just invoke `ipf -f -' and write your rules, the ctrl+c. This is just beautiful! And ALTQ has a very easy to understand, sane configuration fime compared to those Linux tools.
Don't get me wrong. I am using Linux mostly for the desktop and FreeBSD on servers. Both work fine. I just hate iptables syntax.
[ Show thread ] [ Reply to this comment ] [ Mod Up ] [ Mod Down ]
Add Story |
Copyright © 2004-2008
All rights reserved.
Articles and comments are copyright their respective authors,
submission implies license to publish on this web site.
Contents of the archive prior to April 2nd 2004 as well as images
and HTML templates were copied from the fabulous original
Jim's kind permission.
Some icons from slashdot.org
used with permission from Kathleen.
This journal runs as CGI with
on OpenBSD, the
source code is
Search engine is ht://Dig.
undeadly \Un*dead"ly\, a. Not subject to death; immortal. [Obs.]