Contributed by Peter N. M. Hansteen on from the classic come-on dept.
The initial commit message reads,
List: openbsd-ports-cvs
Subject: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports
From: Antoine Jacoutot <ajacoutot () cvs ! openbsd ! org>
Date: 2025-07-28 12:35:38
CVSROOT: /cvs
Module name: ports
Changes by: ajacoutot@cvs.openbsd.org 2025/07/28 06:35:38
Log message:
Import cde-2.5.2
CDE - The Common Desktop Environment is X Windows desktop environment that was
commonly used on commercial UNIX variants such as Sun Solaris, HP-UX and IBM
AIX. Developed between 1993 and 1999, it has now been released under an Open
Source licence by The Open Group.
=> this is not hooked to the build yet as it still needs some fixes and
improvements.
tweak and ok sthen@
Status:
Vendor Tag: ajacoutot
Release Tags: ajacoutot_20250728
N ports/x11/cde/distinfo
N ports/x11/cde/Makefile
N ports/x11/cde/pkg/DESCR
N ports/x11/cde/pkg/PLIST
N ports/x11/cde/pkg/README
N ports/x11/cde/patches/patch-programs_dtksh_ksh93_src_lib_libast_features_wchar
N ports/x11/cde/patches/patch-doc_Makefile_am
N ports/x11/cde/patches/patch-lib_DtMmdb_btree_berkeley_memmove_c
N ports/x11/cde/patches/patch-programs_dtcm_libDtCmP_util_h
N ports/x11/cde/patches/patch-programs_dtmail_include_DtMail_DtMailTypes_h
No conflicts created by this import
It is worth noting that this is not linked to the build yet, so will likely not be immediately available as a package. But you are of course free to build the port locally and take in the classic Unix desktop experience.
Also worth noting is ajacoutot@'s
warning:
[…] I wouldn't use is as a daily driver, it's old unsecure code but it's fun if you want to bring back memories. […]
The Editors look forward to seeing this properly available as a package in a future snapshot.
(Comments are closed)

By Emiel Kollof (ekollof) emiel@kollof.nl on andrath.nl
Don't bother just yet, it doesn't even build. Tested on 7-current (snap as of today)
Comments
By pegasus (pegasus) pegasus@nerv.eu.org on
I played with it a couple of years ago on linux, it's also surprisingly buggy for such an old and supposedly well tested code. Pity ...